Canal Life

Canal Life by Jon Seagrave.

OK, let’s start with the pretty picture. You can imagine it: pale winter sun and a light mist rising from the still water; the air perfumed with the sweet sulphur of coal-smoke, curling in slow wreaths across the frosted towpath. An early morning cyclist creaks through the stillness, past the endless, jumbled line of colourful boats, roofs piled high with flower-pots and bicycles, firewood and coal-sacks. A black flag hangs limply from a cane. Somewhere an ancient Lister engine coughs into life, a slow, erratic chug, as someone gets ready for a pre-breakfast move. It’s like a tiny town, transient and ever-shifting. No grid electricity. No mains water. Just one long street…

There’s lots of mornings just like that. They help you keep going.

So I lived on the canal. This was something that was bound to happen at some point, what with canals being edge places, and- without getting too Will Self about it- I’m deeply attracted to edge places. They’re somehow ingrained in my psyche; a youth spent exiled on the Outer London suburban margins seems to have stained me indelibly, however much I longed to escape it at the time. Adult me just can’t walk through a nice, juicy transitional interzone without getting all worked up. I’m hot for a liminal hotspot, and few places flaunt this status more brazenly than the canal.

Canal Life by Jon Seagrave.

OK, let’s start with the pretty picture. You can imagine it: pale winter sun and a light mist rising from the still water; the air perfumed with the sweet sulphur of coal-smoke, curling in slow wreaths across the frosted towpath. An early morning cyclist creaks through the stillness, past the endless, jumbled line of colourful boats, roofs piled high with flower-pots and bicycles, firewood and coal-sacks. A black flag hangs limply from a cane. Somewhere an ancient Lister engine coughs into life, a slow, erratic chug, as someone gets ready for a pre-breakfast move. It’s like a tiny town, transient and ever-shifting. No grid electricity. No mains water. Just one long street…

There’s lots of mornings just like that. They help you keep going.

So I lived on the canal. This was something that was bound to happen at some point, what with canals being edge places, and- without getting too Will Self about it- I’m deeply attracted to edge places. They’re somehow ingrained in my psyche; a youth spent exiled on the Outer London suburban margins seems to have stained me indelibly, however much I longed to escape it at the time. Adult me just can’t walk through a nice, juicy transitional interzone without getting all worked up. I’m hot for a liminal hotspot, and few places flaunt this status more brazenly than the canal.

For canals are topographical and psychological border-straddlers. They are beauty and horror. Foliage and filth. City and country. The canal- natural home to the dumped car and the diesel spill- is nevertheless the only place in Kensal Rise where you’ve a hope in hell of seeing a kingfisher. It’s where shop-floor workers surrender Sundays to the solitude of fishing, where drug dealers dart to seek sanctuary from CCTV and where lovers turn tail on the traffic to walk hand-in-hand through a wet dream. The leafy, sun-dappled canal: final resting place of a thousand stolen bicycles and suicidal supermarket trolleys. It’s a wild, light-and-shade world. And for five glorious, exciting, teeth-gnashing years, my tiny floating living room slipped through that world. Through it and in it and of it. At a steady 3 knots, woodsmoke from a wonky chimney curling over the recycled-saucepan roof-garden; a Quentin Blake illustration come to life. Five years and two boats. My partner managed thirteen years. I started out on the Llangollen Canal, lived for a while a stone’s throw from Stroud on the Gloucester and Sharpness and finally spent a few years shifting around with the glorious, rag-tag army of boat-dwellers at the western end of the Kennet & Avon.

For those five years my home was my fixed point of reference on a drift through an England that unfolded at the speed things should unfold. This was a life being lived in defiance of the breathless acceleration of the zeitgeist. Yes, you can drive from Bath to London in under two hours, if that’s what you really need or want to do. But only a madman would attempt it in under two weeks on the canal. You just cannot rush the filling of a lock. It takes time. Just as whole days can be ‘lost’ to the procurement of firewood, or filling your tanks up with water. Whether this is an inconvenient nightmare or a joyous reunion with the basics is up to you, really. You and your attitude. For canal life- especially winter canal life- will force you to strip away the bullshit, the fripperies; to focus on necessities, whether you like it or not- on simple pleasures like food and warmth and making your own entertainment. Resist it, and it’s hell. Surrendering to it can be an act of subversion, of liberation; a small act of personal revolution.

I surrendered. It was hard, but I did it. So did many others. There was Jassy and Ted, for instance; pirate-obsessed punk-folk musicians on a 1930’s 65-footer with two kids and a dog and a pile of accordions. There was Chris, veteran of 30 years ‘on the cut’, sleeping in a nest of tools under tarpaulin in the hold of a beloved ancient workboat. Charlie the legendary juggler on a beautiful Dutch barge, immaculate hand-lettered paintjob done by himself. Adey the gardener and Jaz the care worker. Katherine the A&E nurse. There was Will on one coal-boat and Henk on another, earning precarious livings supplying stove-fuel and diesel to a floating customer base. Purple-haired Jacqui, in her 60s, battling cancer and authority and refusing to budge her boat from Bathampton. And hundreds of others, and this was just the Kennet and Avon. In London- where the housing crisis has driven the enterprising out of the house and onto the water like hipster rats- boats moor up three abreast in places. These are intense, frugal lives in difficult times; lives underpinned by mutual aid, co-operation and some damn good parties.

The canal system in the early twenty-first century has a rapidly-expanding population- far higher than it ever did in its industrial heyday- and it floats vastly more boats than it was ever intended to do, fuelled in no small part by the insanities of the landlubber property market. Canals back in the day offered a rough, tough life for those who lived and worked them, and their post-industrial rebirth has attracted a new generation of boat-dwellers happy- or at least prepared- to embrace the privations and inconveniences that come hand-in-hand with the freedoms and autonomies of life on the marginal frontier. The modern canals are now home to a disparate community of romantics, runaways and refugees; resolute low-impact anarchists and ribald low-income artists mooring up with mid-life-crisis cases making the best of the bad half of the divorce settlement. All of them wintered up in cramped but cosy narrowboats, feeding skip-scraps into smoking stoves; frugal pioneers in city-limit wildernesses where pylons crackle and fizz above dead-grass wasteland and the ring-road rumble moans like a prairie wind.

And for decades they’ve been left to get on with it, a sub-strata of the poor and disenfranchised doing what the poor and disenfranchised have always done- finding ways to carve out rich lives in the cracks the affluent and powerful have overlooked. And the canal certainly is a crack. A long, thin, water-filled spreading crack that crazes across from the Pennine wilds and the empty Wiltshire downs right into the heart of the most expensive real estate in the country; a crack where the pauper herbalist in her ramshackle floating cottage can chug with impunity deep into the heart of pimped-up millionaire’s Islington. And that sort of audacity is bound, sooner or later, to wind up certain people. It happened with squatting; with so-called ‘new-age travellers’. And now it seems The Man, clutching an arsenal of brooms- gentrification, ‘progress’, political expedience and just good old-fashioned prejudice- is threatening to sweep this crack clean. But we’ll leave the bad stuff til later.

I’m aware the portrait I’ve been painting so far of modern canal life might sound like it’s been lifted straight from some gonzo version of a waterways break brochure; reality is obviously a bit more complex. As with everywhere else, the narrowboat-dwelling world is, sadly, increasingly finding itself polarised by what I suppose amounts to a kind of class war; the gulf between the Haves and the Have Nots. As with everywhere else, the Haves and Have Nots don’t get on very well, what with the money and power being overwhelmingly on one side. I’m going to wildly generalise here, but the Haves could be said to consist of a broadly united front of hire-boat companies, weekend boaters with home moorings and marina berths, and retirees in Ted Heath deck shoes, polishing portholes and pottering the inland waterway network on a comfortable pension. Sorry, that’s stereotyping as well as generalising, but you get the picture. There’s overwhelmingly a shared outlook. And behind this united front, of course, lurks the all-powerful shadow of The Man. And the have-nots? Well, that’s all the people I listed earlier. Non-stakeholders, as New Labour might term them.

These Have-nots- of which I, of course, was one- have, well, very little. The clue is in the name. They’ll have a boat of some sort, but that’s often where it ends. Most people work, but it’s rarely highly-paid; there’s every permutation of artist and care profession, but very few corporate lawyers. They rarely have ‘home moorings’; moorings are expensive, rent in recent years spiralling toward insanity levels just as it has in the ‘other’ world (indeed, a residential mooring in London is little cheaper than renting a flat- and you have to provide the boat to go with it). Marinas are even more expensive, and anyway, what romantic wants to live cheek-by-jowl in a glorified floating car park? With no mooring and no marina berth comes none of the conveniences they offer: no electric hook-up, no little garden, no handy storage shed- nothing, in fact, besides the rapidly-becoming-pejorative label ‘continuous cruiser’. Defined and marked by the strictures of their boating licence, continuous cruisers live an enforced yet for the most part welcome vagabondage, following an old enshrined canal law simply requiring movement every fourteen days. So neighbourhoods change each fortnight; a fluid community of interchangeable neighbours and shifting familiarity. Musicians might choose to moor up together awhile to ‘jam’; families might do similar, so the kids can play. Those who work near to each other might travel together to lift-share from a nearby car. Others moor up alone or in groups, as whim or sociability dictates.

And these moored-up groups of continuous cruisers present a colourful sight. ‘Liveaboard’ boats can be strange and beautiful things; all shapes and sizes, exercises in self-sufficiency, sustainability, imagination and improvisation. Sure, if you’ve got the cash you can buy a state-of-the-art bespoke narrowboat or replica Dutch barge as mod-conned as any brick dwelling, but that’s rarely the name of the game in the liveaboard community. You buy what you an afford; if you’ve got a few thousand, a ‘retired’ leisure hire boat in need of a refit or an ancient wooden-hulled ex-working boat that oozes charm and leaks water in equal amounts. Old ‘plastic fantastic’ fibreglass cabin cruisers change hands for just a couple of hundred quid; some folk even build benders from hazel poles and tatted canvas on cabinless hulls found half-sunk and abandoned. Refloated first, of course. Then there are lifeboats sold cheap off decommissioned oilrigs and repurposed by determined boat-punks. Homes are kitted out with wood from B&Q or from skips, as budget allows. There’ll usually be a solid fuel burner of some sort, a gas cooker, a toilet of varying degrees of horror and probably an engine, though they’re not to everyone’s taste. The required movement of a couple of miles a fortnight means there’s room for folk like Shaun, happy to pole or rope-haul, pulling his home literally at walking pace, or Bev, whose 40-footer is pedal-powered via a rig welded up by Danny from Rinky Dink. Solar panels are a wise investment; combined with the engine alternator and leisure batteries and you’ve got a reliable 12v electricity system and a range of creature comforts.

The size and vibrancy of the communities on the Kennet and Avon and in London and elsewhere gives rise to ad-hoc floating community facilities, too. A converted lifeboat had been refitted to operate as a mobile shebeen; a below-radar ‘local’ that endlessly shifts locality. And there was a Theatre Boat; an ex-River Avon tourist sightseeing boat called the Antoinette. No licence, no safety features, no working toilet and no reliable electricity, but a well-stocked bar, an outdoor smoking deck and no shortage of performers prepared to slum it and give it a go in the name of community spirit and something a bit different. There are floating shops, floating cafes and floating markets. London has a floating bookshop that recently won a long-running battle for survival.

With all sorts jumbled together and living on the edge, community is of necessity both strong and tolerant. Eccentricities are accepted, awkward cases given a lot of leeway and the vulnerable are looked out for. Jacqui with her cancer has an endless stream of visitors and people helping out; the advantage of all living together on the one, long street is that everyone comes pottering by at some point. Mutual support is just ingrained. If your engine packs up, help is at hand. If your boat starts sinking (it happens) then a quick phone call brings boaters from far and wide, rigging up the emergency pumps and working day and night, bailing you out in every sense. And, needless to say, the interference of the authorities and the Old Bill is avoided as much as humanly possible. And so canal life carried on; joy and near-disaster and falling asleep to the sound of rain on the roof.

But then, in 2012, it seemed that Authority decided it’d had enough of being avoided. In July of that year, the heat conspicuously got turned up.

Now don’t get me wrong; it’s not like liveaboard boaters were ever welcomed with open arms; since time immemorial people living unconventional existences have been a convenient target for authorities both great and petty. But the canals were literally and metaphorically a backwater, largely forgotten or ignored; convoys of buses heading for Stonehenge, empty embassies squatted by embarrassing housing activists and pensioners refusing to leave their homes to make way for urban motorways made for a more visible or more urgent target. But, as gentrification mopped up more and more of the cities, the cockroaches of capital began grubbing further afield for overlooked morsels ripe for exploitation. And eventually they found the canals. For donkeys’ years, authority over the canal system had resided with British Waterways, an under-funded and over-stretched nationalised body that had too much on its plate just trying to patch up the infrastructure to spare the time and money to harass undesirables as effectively as it and its government overseers would probably have liked. But then, in July 2012, the vogue for denationalisation finally reached the tranquillity of the canal network, and management passed to the newly-created Canal and Rivers Trust (CaRT), a body whose charitable status many boat-dwellers initially mistook as implying some sort of benign intent.

Instead, things suddenly changed for the worse. Seemingly overnight, patrol notices- the waterways equivalent of parking tickets- started adorning boats like malevolent bunting. Waterways patrol officers who used to share a cuppa with you now scurried past fives times as often, heads down. They started carrying GPS equipment and portable computers, logging registration numbers and plotting day-to-day movements. Annual boat licences started being refused on spurious grounds; the unlicensed boat then being impounded and the owner fined. Court battles ensued as CaRT tried, illegally, to redefine the fortnightly continuous cruising rules to effectively make living on a boat and holding down a job or keeping your kids in school impossible. Threatening notices were put on boats informing the owners that they had no legal rights on the waterways and to get themselves on the housing register with Bath Council (Bath Council, naturally, hit the roof; boaters, as far as they were concerned, had sorted out their housing themselves and CaRT could damn well put up with them). Vested interest groups, like the rapidly-multiplying hire boat and marina companies, now sat on the CaRT board and could see the opportunity to purge the canal of eyesore scruffs that littered a waterways system crying out, as they saw it, for full recuperation and realisation as a profit-making leisure amenity and nothing else. Leaked emails from influential figures in the corporate waterways world even revealed that, for some, a more ‘traditional’ Final Solution for the liveaboard boaters would be preferred, but hey, in the meantime they’d make do with legislation and harassment.

I’ve nothing against hire boats, or anyone else who uses the canal. The vast majority of liveaboard boaters are happy to co-exist with a whole variety of waterways users- hireboats, anglers, canoeists, towpath cyclists and more. As habitual dwellers on the margins, boaters tend to be of the tolerant, flexible, live-and-let-live sort. They just want to be left to get on with living their lives; difficult but rewarding, self-determined lives in times where homelessness and insecurity are at epidemic levels. But this easy-going attitude is not shared by the other side, and we’re now four years in to a concerted campaign to, as they see it, ‘clean up’ the canal system. Ignoring the fact that liveaboard boaters annually contribute hundreds of pounds each in licence fees, the battle is on to erase some of the most colourful strata of margin from this multi-layered Edgeland. To tame what has always been rough and wild and slightly lawless, from the navvies that built them through the old guard who worked them to the colourful communities that populate them now. To sanitise this grubby netherworld, to prettify it and market it as some kind of linear Center Parcs where busy city families can consume tranquillity at walking pace and a hefty price, where the only liveaboards left are the neatly-polished mobile retirement homes that fit the marketable image and happily cough up marina fees or just endlessly move on, unhindered by jobs or children. The irony of course is that for the most part holidaymaker boaters love the bonkers, flower-bedecked and picturesque liveaboard boats of the continuous cruiser community. They are part of the whole experience; part of the richness and diversity of the waterways. No-one photographs the hire boats.

The battle is by no means lost. Boaters in London especially have become very organised, and the harassment there at least has subsided somewhat in the last couple of years- foiled, no doubt, by the sheer weight of numbers as much as anything. But it hasn’t gone away. And elsewhere it continues unabated. I left the canals because an expanding family just made it increasingly impractical. Others have left simply because the increasing insecurity just became too much to live with. And that is tragic. The coming of the kingdom of the bland.

Now, living happily as a house-dweller on a hilltop in Stroud, my contact with canals is walking the towpath of the Stroudwater and the Thames and Severn. Overgrown and derelict, alive with industrial ghosts, the Cotswold canal system is irresistible to the Deep Topographer in me. It is my daily dog walk of choice, my go-to for contemplation or when a difficult poem needs a perambulatory push. Out through Thrupp and Brimscombe it winds through some of the sexiest ramshackle blue-brick factories and rusted light industrial units I’ve ever seen. Boatless, the canal is still effortlessly my favourite place.

And I watch the restoration of this Cotswold system with mixed feelings. Yes, it’s another layer of narrative, another slow change in a lifetime of slow change. It could be glorious, of course; the colourful, creative, tolerant and anarchistic spirit of this town spilling out to find expression on the newly freed-up water. Part of me can vision it. Stroud is so suited to the Heath Robinson eco art-party of the modern waterway life: permacultured micro roof gardens, mini wind-turbines, spirit of tolerance and people helping each other. But that all rather depends who is going to be in charge, doesn’t it? On whether the current war is won or lost. Because if it’s lost, then the Stroudwater will presumably simply be another tarted-up sphere of operation for a bland leisure industry and fleets of identical corporate hireboats. One more example of a waterway socially-cleansed and pimped out as a bastardised Temporary Autonomous Zone; a weekend World Turned Upside Down where the kingfishers have fled and stag parties and stressed city boys needing a chillax blow-out are routinely put in charge of 18 tons of welded steel whilst visibly drunk and dressed as Jack Sparrow.

And something tells me that won’t go down too well in Chalford.

Before The Luddites

Before the Luddites Custom, community and machinery in the English woollen industry, 1776-1809

Adrian Randall CUP

This wonderful book opens with an exploration of the pejorative use of the term ‘Luddites’ – they were right weren’t they? Wages did fall and goods could deteriorate – and how they ‘could little have imagined the linguistic legacy they were to bequeath to posterity.’ Randall points out that a focus upon direct action – rioting and so on – does not ‘accentuate’ the ‘atypical’: ‘riots often provide historians with our only point of access’ into the past values, attitudes and traditions of custom-held rights. And this point of access reveals that ‘Resistance to machinery was multiform … peaceful petitioning, appeals to the courts … negotiations … strike action, intimidation and riot.’ Randall shows how this resistance echoed 18th century Gloucestershire food riots – ‘Just as food riots reveal order, discrimination and a clear moral economy, so do the community-based riots against the jenny and scribbling machine.’

 Before the Luddites Custom, community and machinery in the English woollen industry, 1776-1809

Adrian Randall CUP

This wonderful book opens with an exploration of the pejorative use of the term ‘Luddites’ – they were right weren’t they? Wages did fall and goods could deteriorate – and how they ‘could little have imagined the linguistic legacy they were to bequeath to posterity.’ Randall points out that a focus upon direct action – rioting and so on – does not ‘accentuate’ the ‘atypical’: ‘riots often provide historians with our only point of access’ into the past values, attitudes and traditions of custom-held rights. And this point of access reveals that ‘Resistance to machinery was multiform … peaceful petitioning, appeals to the courts … negotiations … strike action, intimidation and riot.’ Randall shows how this resistance echoed 18th century Gloucestershire food riots – ‘Just as food riots reveal order, discrimination and a clear moral economy, so do the community-based riots against the jenny and scribbling machine.’

“Non-fiction uses facts to help us see the lies. Fiction uses metaphor to help us see the truth.”

Thoughts derived from a reading of

Creating Memorials Building Identities The Politics of Memory in the Black Atlantic

(Alan Price Liverpool University Press 2012)

Doors of No Return,

Historic, documented, liminal places,

Not gone with the wind, but both visible and invisible,

Spaces and places in the Stroudwater hills and valleys

With messages and mementoes from a riotous past,

Open doors to the truth –

So how do we create a counter-narrative?

“A performative counter-narrative … a ‘guerrilla memory’”,

“Lieux de memoire, sites of history, torn away from the moment of history”

(Pierre Nora),

Memorialisation that moves beyond the empirical,

The documented, the evidenced and the historical,

To a counter-heritage, a counter-memorialisation…

For further reinterpretations,

And re-imaginings,

As we move art and monument

From object to process,

And from ‘noun to verb’,

As we create new museums of the past, present and future…

This reimagining is the result of Mr Randall’s inspiring research and writings.

‘I was born in Woodchester, near Stroud in 1772. I am now in my fortieth year, heartened and invigorated by news of the Luddites up north. (They say there are more Stroud Scarlet troops up there than are being used against the French. What say you, Mr Johnson?) Anyway, this invigoration has led me to pick up my quill and record my memories – such as they are, of the struggles of our scribblers, spinners, shearmen, weavers, men and women in Stroudwater, in my lifetime.

The master clothiers as a body looked down on us with smiling condescension, and although groaning from over indulgence, excoriated us if we had a tankard or two on our St Mondays – some worse than others – but I want to be more particular with my History – I have my notes here in my ledger by my side on the table – We used to discuss the Gloucester Journal at the ale house and I diligently kept a faithful record of both the journal and our debates in a sort of diary. I shall, part by wit, part by design, and part by happenstance, now present my evidence for Posterity, as though Posterity itself were both judge and jury. For the sake of brevity and clarity, I have chosen to edit some of my evidence. This will be shown by ellipsis.

I start my chronicle at Woodchester in 1792, when the Journal reported that ‘A considerable number of the most idle of the people employed in the clothing trade … proceeded to seduce the work people to follow them … but … could not succeed as they found them universally convinced of the advantages of the machines rendered … The rioters finding their cause desperate, dispersed as fast as possible.’

Well, I was there, at my Baptism, you might say, and I can say with all due Veracity that it was only the threat of the special constables that made us disperse. And as for the advantages of these machines, why then, did the authorities choose to suppress all news of the Tumult and unrest caused by these infernal things? I know what occurred but it weren’t in the Gloucester Journal.

And if these machines were so advantageous, then why did the scribblers petition thus?

‘To the Landowners, Renters and others affected by the poor … a great number of persons brought up in the business of wool scribbling are now nearly deprived of employment in consequence of scribbling machines.’ And if there was such a collegiate Commonwealth between clothier, machine and worker, why did the clothiers dismiss any shearman, and woman who had been part of this petition? And why did they declare that: ‘Should the scribblers obtain their demands, the industry would be ruined.’

The petition failed, of course; machinery advanced; Sir George Paul, hearing that a few of us had been reading The Rights of Man, helped foster the burning of a guyed Tom Paine in Minchinhampton. That didn’t stop the food Riots happening, but Sir George sniffed the air and he saw phantoms: Corresponding Societies and the French Revolution: ‘This is but the beginning of an evil that will turn to desperate consequences’, quoth the good Sir George.

Sir George perceived what he called Evil all over the Valleys, and particularly so in Uley in 1795 when this note was sent: ‘No King but a constitution down down down o fatall dow high caps and proud hats for ever dow down we all.’ Sir George could not imagine that poor folk could think about abstract Ideas, Rights and Principles; he imagined that hunger was the fundament – ‘the cry of want of bread … forms a body of insurgents, amongst them are mixed a number of seditious persons’, quoth the good and philanthropic Sir George.

His associate, the Earl of Berkeley possessed a similarly disparaging View of us, but he did have the capacity for perceiving that some of us could think. I have this in my ledger: ‘A vein of bad materials runs through the lower order in the clothing part of the county which still continues to study Tom Paine with a few political clubs of the very dregs and of T. Paine’s cash’. Dregs indeed. We can see the source of the Earl’s metaphors.

Sir George might have feared insurgents and seditiousness, but his patriotism was of a most intriguing texture. During the invasion scare of 1798 some master clothiers bade workmen that they should join volunteer militia – Sir George was rather more perturbed about his workmen bearing weapons than the French sailing up the Severn. Yet he was above embarrassment, as so many of his class: ‘If too many of them should get under arms … and no enemy appear, they might take an opportunity of holding strong language to their masters on the sore point of increasing machinery.’ Shall I add an exclamation mark? No. I do not think one is needed.

The shearmen were patriots mostly, however, and wedded to law and constitution, and married to Deference: ‘It is not the wish of the petitioners that the use of gig mills should be entirely suppressed, but only to confine them to … such cloth … the coarser sort.’ But such Deference could not budge Sir George from his entrenched opposition. Here is the beneficent Sir George again – ‘When I see a number of decent, orderly men … who can relinquish a life of industry which produced a comfortable subsistence and who determine themselves to be dismissed by their employers … for the purpose of laying on a piece of useless paper on the table of the House of Commons, I cannot but presume that they are biased by some motive adverse to reason.’

Truly, one man’s meat is another man’s poison, and so it is with reason.

I regret to say that Deference brought nought but unwished for consequence – the gig mills continued their advancement; Wiltshire rioted; some Gloucestershire shearmen communicated with the Brief Institution in the West Riding, a form of Combination, and then in 1800 … ‘Some evil disposed person’, ‘destroyed three cloths … in the rack grounds … at Rodborough and … nine more … in … Woodchester’; a reward of £100 was increased by another 500 guineas after yet another clothiers’ meeting at The Fleece; a penitent Joseph Stephens was hanged for the offence. The goodly clothiers uttered some mealy-mouthed cant, asking that shearing machines should only be taken up ‘in such a manner as not to deprive any of their shearmen of Employ’.

And mealy-mouthed Cant it was and Hypocrisy and Deceit.

I have written so far of the scribblers. I will now turn my pen to the struggles of the weavers, and then return to the food Riots. Like the scribblers, the weavers wanted to shun the ways of Wiltshire, and follow the path of peaceful Deputation. So it was thus: a meeting with Mr Watts, the Stonehouse clothier, about his new looms; followed by a mass meeting up on Rodborough Common; followed by the master clothiers’ customary meeting at The Fleece; followed by the clothiers meeting with Nathaniel Watts of Stonehouse.

The Consequence? ‘The miseries of the manufacturing poor are now inexpressibly greater … provisions being extremely dear, trade also languishing. … Bisley and Chalford Bottom particularly afford melancholy proof of how many wretches of the clothing district are prompted by the despair to wander about and trust to the shelter of hedges and barns rather than starve under their own ineffectual roofs.’

And so my pen is inexorably led to the Tumult caused by Want. With the price of bread so high and with wages so low and work so scarce, patience was at an end. Men and women and boys and girls marched down to the Navigations. They were at their Wits’ ends. Moral, frugal God-fearing and law abiding folk who could take no more and who were disinclined to see their children starve whilst food was exported from our fields along the waters to London. And so they tried, like pirates of yore on the high seas, to board the Barges laden with wheat. But blowing of Horns, and carrying knives to open Bags and Sacks of flour could not stop what also seemed to be the inexorable march of machinery.

‘Paul Wathen you Hare a Damd in Fernald Scoundrel and We will Teack yuir Damd Life from you if Don’t teacl care of yuirself. And We Hear in Formed that you got Shear in mee shens and if you Don’t pull them Down in a Forght Nights Time Wee will pull them Down for you Wee will you damnd infernald Dog. Andd Bee four Almighty God We will pull down all the Mills that heave Heaney Shearin me Shens in Wee will cut out Hall your Damd Hearts as do Ceep them and Wee will meack the rst Heat them or els Wee will searve them the seam.

Thear Read this and Weep do you For your Time is but shourt Hear your Damd Villian Raskell.’

No one hereabouts knows who wrote this Note but The manuscript ends abruptly here – pages have been torn out (see later).

The manuscript then continues

‘Workmen have been guilty of repeated acts of malicious mischief and of sending anonymous letters of a threatening and diabolical tendency … they have frequently resorted to … cutting the cloths in the tenters during the Night.’ That was Thomas Croome, Stroud Magistrate, after the destruction at King’s Stanley, 1805. Further Destruction followed throughout the valleys – the news was suppressed. But here’s what happened: LOOM SHOPS WERE ATTACKED THROUGHOUT STROUDWATER by what those of us in the know called The Stroudwater Secret Combination. We were a small group, but effective in our nocturnal Visitations. We tried to have at least one Member in each Village and theUnfortunately, some pages are missing here – they have obviously been torn out.

It seems that the pages were deliberately removed to protect persons unknown.

We think the compiler of this manuscript was Charles William Butler. The Woodchester parish records show his baptism on Aug 22nd 1772. Records of births, deaths and marriages show that he died at Clerkenwell, London, in 1852. There is evidence of a William Butler working as a boatman on the Thames and Severn Canal and River Thames at Lechlade in 1816. A William Butler married Charlotte Alice Bingham in Rodborough in 1795. A William Butler of Clerkenwell appears in the Chartist Allen Davenport’s recently discovered manuscripts.

We can, however, continue our narrative through the eyes of Alice Bingham. Alice broke with gender conventions and worked as a weaver, not a spinner. She was something of an iconoclast and was equally resolute in opposing the master clothiers in their desires to introduce loom shops. She was born in Rodborough in 1776 and kept a journal from the age of sixteen. Her journal provides a fascinating insight into Gloucestershire for about ten years, before she moved to the West Riding. We omit the introduction from her journal so as to maintain emphasis, and jump straight to her recording of the notorious events at Uley in 1792.

The Uley weavers told Nathaniel Lloyd straight to his face that he was breaking both law and custom by having multiple looms under one roof. This led to the Uley Skimmington of the mid-summer. Two score and more weavers congregated outside John Teakle’s: ‘You be working under price for that damned Lloyd, Teakle’.’Give us that bloody cloth or we’ll dip ee with the skimmington’ and, ‘We shall have the slates off your roof if ee don’t comply, you damned rogue’ and such forth.

The long, tall and the short of it is that Teakle’s cloth got trampled on; he was ducked over Owlpen way, and there was a skimmington procession with him bestride the pole, through Horsley and Nailsworth then back to Uley until ale got the better of the weavers. When they got back to Uley, Teakle hid in William Webb’s house; doors, windows and slates were smashed.

Most of the crowd faced charges, but the good opinion of the churchwardens and the vicar of Horsley – ‘men of sober and orderly conduct’; ‘peaceable’; ‘good character’, and so on – resulted in lenient sentences. It also counted for them that Teakle and Webb had previously incurred the attention of the law: both had seen the inside of the lock-up.

We wondered if the sentences were also an olive branch to all the Stroud valleys – but if so, it was to no avail. Unrest continued, but strange to relate – or is it? – Not one report appeared in the journals and newspapers.

I see no reason to name names now. The only one I will detail is that of the Reverend William Lloyd-Baker: ‘I perfectly agree with your friends that government do wisely to keep it secret. The less riots are talked of the less likely they are to increase or succeed.’

He and his ilk weren’t just perturbed by the antagonism caused by loom shops, jennies and gig mills of course. They were aware that some of us were reading The Rights of Man; were opposed to monarchy, and could see the advantages of a republic. That’s why they made their pretence and dissimulated.

But it was not all tumult and nocturnal depredations. The majority of our weavers saw no reason to break the law; they said the law, precedent and custom were on our side; the Gloucestershire Society of Broad and Narrow Cloth Weavers was formed late in the year of 1793 – but the authorities responded with troops and militia, particularly in the vicinity, and streets, of Wotton-under-Edge and Dursley. St Clem’s Day resounded like a hammer on the anvil.

In the north of Stroudwater, in Bisley, the weavers maintained the use of law: they took legal action against a Chalford clothier who transgressed customary working. There was a consequent meeting at the Berkeley Arms – in Cam – in the south of Stroudwater – this was how effective we were – and a new Weavers’ Society was formed. It was modelled on Friendly Societies, with detailed rules, subscriptions and a calendar of meetings. It desired to maintain custom, maintain wages and prevent illegal working. Three thousand members and this conciliatory demeanour counted for nought with the master clothiers, however. Strikes followed in Wotton-under-Edge just as night follows day.

I argued that the Weavers’ Society was trapped like a fly in a spider’s web. Trapped between conciliatory deference, resolute clothiers and a few equally resolute weavers, who wanted the Society to countenance the law-breaking, machine-breaking stance of the Wiltshire weavers. Then the giant spider, Parliament, would come along and abolish the very laws that previously protected the weavers.

The Society lacked all potency.

A few of us talked of printing handbills or chalking exhortations on mill walls and parish workhouses: ‘Cheap Bread!’; ‘Cheap Bread and No King!’ But the inclement weather and the constant rain, together with a lack of copper, and a talk of government spies, all conspired to mute us. We didn’t trust those men from the North with their talk of revolution and a republic, but circumstances alter cases and so I resolved to tramp north to seek work in the summer of 1802.

Here endeth the Stroudwater chapter of my narrative.

Plus ca change. The day after completing my preparatory reading of Professor Randall’s book, I had to retrieve some euros from a Thomas Cook cash-card – and needless to say, had forgotten the pin number. The website failed me. The hole in the wall failed me. A lengthy period on the ‘phone failed me. So I went into the Thomas Cook shop where the assistant sorted me within seconds.

‘People are better than machines’, I said.

‘That’s what we keep telling head office’, she replied.

I wrote this re-creation at the beginning of the year, 2017, making my rough notes on the hoof ‘in the landscape’. I was on the hunt for The Fleece, in Rodborough (not easy – we had to think about four different possible inns of that name in the parish), where the master clothiers met. It is now, as I eventually discovered, Hillgrove House on the old turnpiked Bath Road, the A46, at the bottom of Bear Hill – which leads up to Rodborough Common.

It was a beautiful winter’s day; I made my way up to the common, sat on a bench so that I could gaze out to Woodchester and so allow the landscape to infuse my thoughts and re-imaginings. Sunlight lustred some scarlet spindle-berries in a bush to my left. I made some draft notes, then wandered to Rodborough’s church, where I sat on an 18th century gravestone in a late afternoon sun, beneath a fretwork of branch-shadows. When it became too cold, I gathered up my notebooks and pens, when a gentleman hobbling along with walking sticks appeared from behind the crepuscular church door.

‘A peaceful place to write’, he said.

It was all a bit Edwin Drood.

I explained briefly what I was about – gazing out to Woodchester and re-creating the lives of weavers and so on.

He was born in Woodchester, he told me; his mum worked in a pin mill before the Great War – ‘pins everywhere then’; told me about Hillgrove House – ‘Used to be The Fleece. That’s where the master clothiers used to meet and where all the decisions were made about the canal and the railway.’

The sun was descending: it was time to go. I told him I would include him in my narrative – a narrative not just of the past, but of how the present and past collide when you write outside, in the landscape: a harmony of the diachronic and synchronic.

But who sent this revenant?

The sources used may be found cited in Before the Luddites: Custom, Community and Machinery in the English Woollen Industry 1776-1809, Cambridge University Press, 1991

Save The Sub-Rooms!

‘In short, sir, you have it in a nutshell.
Where would Stroud be without it?’

We live in such divided times that anything that unites us is to be admired,
And just as a nation can be divided, so a town can be divided in so many ways:
Hefts can build up based on social class, or ethnicity, or politics, or education,
Or for so many whatever varied reasons,
As people find and accentuate commonality,
And whilst Stroud and the Five Valleys is not exactly ‘Town and Gown’,
It can feel a bit like Disraeli’s Two Nations at times:

‘Two nations between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are as ignorant of each other’s habits, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets.’

Stroud Subscription Rooms

Thanks to Deborah Roberts for the above Photo.
www.deborahroberts.biz

 

Stroud Subscription Rooms

Thanks to Mark Hewlett for the above Photo.

 

—

‘In short, sir, you have it in a nutshell.
Where would Stroud be without it?’

We live in such divided times that anything that unites us is to be admired,
And just as a nation can be divided, so a town can be divided in so many ways:
Hefts can build up based on social class, or ethnicity, or politics, or education,
Or for so many whatever varied reasons,
As people find and accentuate commonality,
And whilst Stroud and the Five Valleys is not exactly ‘Town and Gown’,
It can feel a bit like Disraeli’s Two Nations at times:

‘Two nations between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are as ignorant of each other’s habits, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets.’

‘You speak of Brexiteer and Remainer?’

‘No, sir.
I speak of people who shop at the Farmers’ Market and not at Iceland
and those who shop at Iceland and not at the Farmers’ Market.
They sometimes pass each other as though the other were invisible.’

‘And is there nowhere, madam, where these differing people meet?
Where the invisible is made manifest?’

‘The Subscription Rooms, sir, for there you find all manner of amusements that appeal to everyone in Stroud.
It is one of the few places that unite rather than divide,
One of the few places where every one can meet, eat and drink together,
Sing together, dance together, listen together, learn together,
Watch together, gaze together,
Walk up and downstairs together,
Find out where to go and how to get there together.
And it is the only place where you can buy a ticket for a National Express bus.’

‘These Subscription Rooms sound an admirable place, madam.
A place where all differing sections of a community can meet.
A place that brings unity and sharing of experience and purpose.
A place that brings a sense of belonging
And strengthening of bonds across a variety of people
Who otherwise might not share much social intercourse.
And the only place where one can obtain a permit for the turnpike toll house.’

‘In short, sir.
You have it in a nutshell.
Where would Stroud be without it?’


Below Photos by James Bee.

Drought

‘For the rain it raineth every day’:

Floods in the Slad Road when it raineth every day,

Springs and streams racing down five valleys

When the rain it raineth every day.

But drought can bring its own problems too:

‘For the rain it raineth every day’:

Floods in the Slad Road when it raineth every day,

Springs and streams racing down five valleys

When the rain it raineth every day.

But drought can bring its own problems too:

‘The irregularity of water power caused “making up time” to be a regular feature in water-driven mills at some seasons of the year; and if children sometimes only worked 3 hours a day and often only 6, at other times they had to do 12, 14, or even 19. At Eastington work could not begin until after 1 p.m. and at Painswick the water would flow from 10 a.m. or noon until 10 p.m. or midnight, “and it not used would be an enormous loss.”’

1833 Factory Commission Report

Oakridge and The Mason – Dixon Line

It must have been bit like this
When the turnpike trusts improved a road,
Or the inland navigators came to town and village:
Severn Trent out there outside Sapperton Church,
Putting in new pipes,
Such noise and mayhem
And workers whose accents
Were a long way from home.
It brought the children out to watch.
What else is there to do in the country in the 18th century?

It must have been bit like this
When the turnpike trusts improved a road,
Or the inland navigators came to town and village:
Severn Trent out there outside Sapperton Church,
Putting in new pipes,
Such noise and mayhem
And workers whose accents
Were a long way from home.
It brought the children out to watch.
What else is there to do in the country in the 18th century?

I was searching for the grave of Rebekah Mason,
Just by the south chancel wall,
Her life remembered in her husband’s grieving words,
The words of the astronomer and surveyor,
Charles Mason of the Mason-Dixon Line:
‘SACRED
To the Remains of Rebekah
Wife of Chas Mason Jun ARS
With the Greatest Serenity of Mind
She Departed this Life the 13th of Feb 1759
(at Greenwich Kent)
in the 31st year of her Age
Could the unsally’d of Heart from Dissolution save
In Vain might Death assum’d this silent Grave
But Fate how hard!
Her able Morn in Dark Shade expire
And Noontide Sun went down with Jobs Desire’.

I paid my respects,
Had a cheese and chutney sandwich,
Carefully carried my bicycle over the new tarmac,
And headed off towards Oakridge.

Charles Mason was baptized at Sapperton on May Day 1728,
And as a devout Christian,
He would have walked the lane I bicycled
From Oakridge to Sapperton and back
On countless occasions;
When I reached Oakridge,
It took me a while to find the farm where he was born –
Were Farm –
(‘Lower Weir Farm is just there.
Do you want Charles? He’s away in London.’

‘Well, I am looking for Charles, but Charles Mason
of the Mason-Dixon Line. He was born here.’),

I was given generous permission to take pictures,
Before locking my bike and walking out into fields,
Where he would have walked:
I came across a giant, weathered stone,
Serving as a stile –
A stone stile that Charles would have crossed,
Perhaps watching and reading about the enclosure of the fields,
Thinking of the mathematics and measurements involved,
Studying the stars in the vastness of the night skies
Above the Golden Valley,
Cogitating on latitude and longitude …

And so, some years later, out there, in the colonies,
Pennsylvania, Maryland, the Delaware River,
Weighed down with responsibility and Jeremiah Dixon,
Measuring rods, surveyor’s chains, quadrants, builder’s levels,
A sea chest full of almanacs, calendars, geometrical texts,
Tables of stars and the constellations,
Logarithmic tables, terrestrial maps,
Translations of the Iroquois and Lenape tongues …

And on that day when the Iroquois refused to go any farther,
Reluctant to enter lands of their enemies, the Lenape,
At Dunkard Creek, hard by the Morris Mountains,
Two hundred and fifty miles west of the Delaware,
When you had to retrace some steps,
Did you sleep that autumn night, dreaming of home?
Watching the shooting stars,
Then waking and gazing at the colours of the fall,
In the mountain woodlands and forests,
Remembering those Golden Valley walks to Sapperton Church,
Along the Cotswold lanes from Oakridge,
Shedding a tear for Rebekah and her grave,
Thinking that you would swap it all,
All the fame and fortune and adventure,
Just to be beside her again in Gloucestershire.

River Prints

With many thanks to Lucy Guenot:

1. R is for River
Letterpress print, playing with Severn names

2. Severn seeks the sea
Linocut and letterpress, using a phrase from one of Frank Mansell’s Cotswold Ballads: ‘The roads go down’

3. River Frome 1
Linocut of the Frome in the Nailsworth valley

4. River Frome 2
Linocut of the Frome in Stroud alongside Dr Newton’s way

With many thanks to Lucy Guenot:

1. R is for River
Letterpress print, playing with Severn names

2. Severn seeks the sea
Linocut and letterpress, using a phrase from one of Frank Mansell’s Cotswold Ballads: ‘The roads go down’

3. River Frome 1
Linocut of the Frome in the Nailsworth valley

4. River Frome 2
Linocut of the Frome in Stroud alongside Dr Newton’s way

Stroud-water Convicts Spreadsheet 1788-1842

Stroud-water Convicts Spreadsheet 1788-1842

NameAgeJobParishShipDestinationSentenceDate
John Griffin28LabourerAveningTottenhamNew South WalesLife1818
George Ansloe18LabourerBisleyManliusVan Diemen’s Land7 years1828
William Bacchus15LabourerBisleyManliusVan Diemen’s Land7 years1828
Peter Brown21LabourerBisleyBengal merchantNew South Wales7 years1834
John Davis20LabourerBisleyLaytonVan Diemen’s Land15 years1841
Richard Dew43WeaverBisleyAuroraVan Diemen’s LandLife1835
Richard Eddles30CarrierBisleyShipleyNew South Wales14 years1821
William Haines25MarineBisleyLord LyndochNew South WalesLife1833
William Hooper17LabourerBisleyManliusVan Diemen’s Land15 years1828
Isaac King18SawyerBisleyEdenNew South Wales15 years1840
William King40SawyerBisleyEdenNew South WalesLife1840
Samuel Munsden36No occupationBisleyRecoveryNew South WalesLife1819
William Nicholls21CarpenterBisleyGeorgianaVan Diemen’s LandLife1828
John Parsons24BargemanBisleyCoromandelVan Diemen’s Land14 years1837
Levi Poulson25StonemasonBisleyNorfolkNew South Waleslife1836
William Scrivens48LabourerBisleyAgamemnonNew South Wales7 years1820
James smith26LabourerBisleyTottenhamVan Diemen’s Land7 years1818
George Taylor29Cloth-workerBisleyWaterlooNew South WalesLife1837
Jesse Tyler25Slater PlastererBisleyParmeliaNew South WalesLife1832
John Wall21LabourerBisleyCoromandelVan Diemen’s Land30 years1838
John Winslaw26LabourerBisleyLady RidleyVan Diemen’s Land7 years1821
George Bidmead22Cloth-workerBrimscombeNithsdaleNew South Wales14 years1830
Samuel Tocknell 22LabourerBrimscombeSusanNew South Wales7 years1830
Peter Williams23LabourerBrimscombeAsiaVan Diemen’s LandLife1835
Thomas Cooke22LabourerCainscrossBataviaNew South Wales7 years1835
William Nicholls22LabourerCainscrossSusanNew South Wales7 years1835
Cornelius Bendall23LabourerCamAlbionNew South Wales7 years1828
Daniel Ludlow20LabourerCamPrince RegentVan Diemen’s LandLife1829
George Ludlow25LabourerCamBussorah MerchantVan Diemen’s LandLife1829
John martin20LabourerCamHenry TannerNew South WalesLife1834
Samuel Rudge31WeaverCamManliusVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
Thomas Rudge24WeaverCamManliusVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
John Sandford41LabourerCamemilyVan Diemen’s Land10 years1842
Thomas Sinigar18WeaverCamAmericaNew South Wales7 years1829
James White19ButcherCamDunveganNew South Wales7 years1829
Thomas Wilkins26WeaverCamNithsdaleNew South Wales7 years1830
Joseph Berriman20LabourerChalfordSpekeNew South WalesLife1820
Thomas Berriman22ShoemakerChalfordLloydsNew South WalesLife1833
William Berriman55Cloth-workerChalfordSpekeNew South WalesLife1820
Thomas Davis20WatermanChalfordClaudineNew South Wales14 years1829
Benjamin King26No occupationChalfordJohnNew South WalesLife1832
Samuel Ridler21Cloth-workerChalfordManliusVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
John Smith19BlacksmithChalfordRed RoverVan Diemen’s LandLife1830
Thomas Blunson32LabourerCoaleyWoodmanVan Diemen’s LandLife1825
Enoch Elliotts20Flock-dresserCoaleyLaytonVan Diemen’s Land7 years1835
Eli Parsloe15No occupationCoaleyCoromandelVan Diemen’s Land7 years1838
Isaac Powell20LabourerCoaleyYorkNew South Wales7 years1830
William Aldridge 23LabourerDursleyLloydsNew South Wales14 years 1833
John Bendall51LabourerDursleyHeroineNew South Wales7 years 1833
John Brothers23Mill-manDursleyLord LyndochNew South Wales14 years 1833
William Champion22HatterDursleyAsiaVan Diemen’s Land14 years 1823
James Cross14LabourerDursleyRoyal SovereignVan Diemen’s Land7 years 1837
Edward Davis19LabourerDursleyPrincess CharlotteVan Diemen’s Land7 years1824
George Davis17Twine-spinnerDursleyPrincess CharlotteVan Diemen’s Land7 years1824
John Davis20ShoemakerDursleyPrincess CharlotteVan Diemen’s Land7 years1824
John Davis35No occupationDursleyParkfieldNew South Wales14 years1839
Joseph Moody Fletcher22ServantDursleyPrince RegentVan Diemen’s LandLife1829
Henry Ford17LabourerDursleyGeorge the ThirdVan Diemen’s Land7 years1834
Sarah Ford21ServantDursleyPlatinaNew South Wales7 years1836
George Grace23GardenerDursleyHeroineNew South Wales7 years1833
Edward Groves 38LabourerDursleyElizabethVan Diemen’s Land14 years1831
James Grove42ShearmanDursleyLarkinsVan Diemen’s Land14 years1831
Daniel Harrill26LabourerDursleyLord LyndochNew South Wales7 years1833
Joseph Harrold18LabourerDursleyNeptuneVan Diemen’s Land14 years1837
Joseph Herring31LabourerDursleyMariaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1820
John Heath19LabourerDursleyWilliam MilesVan Diemen’s LandLife1828
Elijah Hill23LabourerDursleyWilliam MilesVan Diemen’s Land7 years 1829
George Hill22LabourerDursleyMariaVan Diemen’s Landlife1829
Thomas Hitchins26ShoemakerDursleyCoromandelVan Diemen’s Land7 years1838
David Mabbett31WeaverDursleyEmperor AlexanderVan Diemen’s Land7 years1838
David Morgan27Millman and cloth-rowerDursleyGarland GroveVan Diemen’s Land7 years 1831
Eliza Newthe25BurlerDursleyLucky DavidsonNew South Wales14 years1829
William Nicholls27Spinner Private. MilitiaDursleyAsiaVan Diemen’s LandLife1823
George Smith18Clothing BusinessDursleyLarkinsVan Diemen’s Land7 years1821
Henry Smith23ClothierDursleyAsiaVan Diemen’s Land14 years1833
William Tallboys24LabourerDursleyAtlasVan Diemen’s Land7 years1822
Thomas Watts16LabourerDursleyGeorgianaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1828
William White15LabourerDursleyMermaidNew South WalesLife1829
Henry Williams 27LabourerDursleyHeroineNew South Wales14 years1833
Joseph Wyman38SpinnerDursleyBlenheimVan Diemen’s Land14 years1836
Charles Bailey 19LabourerEastingtonCoromandelVan Diemen’s LandLife1838
Thomas Bendall34WatermanEastingtonDuncanVan Diemen’s Land7 years1840
Susan Partridge 32LabourerEastingtonHarmonyVan Diemen’s Land14 years1827
George Price17LabourerEastingtonAndromedaVan Diemen’s LandLife1826
John Merret33Cloth-workerEastingtonCoromandelVan Diemen’s LandLife1838
Thomas Morgan23LabourerEastingtonNithsdaleVan Diemen’s Land7 years 1830
Aaron Ashmead26fishmongerHorsleyGilmoreVan Diemen’s Land15 years 138
John Beard 22Billy-SpinnerHorsleyLarkinsVan Diemen’s Land7 years1831
David Bishop19LabourerHorsleyEdenVan Diemen’s Land7 years (CTR or Life1836
Sampson Brinkworth28LabourerHorsleyPrince of OrangeVan Diemen’s LandLife1822
Charlotte Clifford18LabourerHorsleyNumaNew South Wales14 years1834
William Dangerfield42LabourerHorsleyLord LyndochVan Diemen’s LandLife1831
John Gardner 44WeaverHorsleyManglesNew South Wales14 years1820
Robert Humphries19LabourerHorsleyManliusVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
William Humphries25CarpenterHorsleyDunveganNew South Wales7 years1829
Joseph Hyde59WeaverHorsleyLord RafflesVan Diemen’s Land7 years1840
Edwin Jenkins 20LabourerHorsleyBurrellNew South Wales7 years1830
James Lovett22PlastererHorsleyLord LyndochVan Diemen’s Landlife1831
James Osborne30LabourerHorsleyEmperor AlexanderVan Diemen’s Land7 years1833
George Pegler22WeaverHorsleyManliusVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
Daniel Rickards19Cloth-workerHorsleyMoffattVan Diemen’s Land7 years 1837
Esay Risby23LabourerHorsleyHuntleyNew South WalesLife1835
Robert Saunders40LabourerHorsleyLord LyndochNew South Wales15 years1838
John Sutton 23LabourerHorsleyPrince RegentVan Diemen’s LandLife1828
Thomas Taynton23LabourerHorsleyPersianVan Diemen’s Land7 years1822
Samuel Walkley18LabourerHorsleysusanNew South Wales7 years1834
Edward Window22No occupationHorsleyManglesNew South Wales7 years1839
Thomas Window52Served for MilitaryHorsleyNorfolkVan Diemen’s Land7 years1826
Peter Aldridge25ShearerKing StanleyAndromedaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1826
Richard Baker23LabourerKing StanleyElizabeth 1New South Wales7 years1820
George Beard23Cloth-workerKing StanleyJohn Barry7 years1834
John BloodworthLabourerKing StanleyJohnNew South Wales7 years1836
James Coleman 23ShearmanKing StanleyRed RoverVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
Samuel Harrison23MasonKing StanleyShipleyNew South Wales14 years1818
John Howard17WeaverKing StanleyManliusVan Diemen’s Land7 years1828
William Jenkins38LabourerKing StanleyMalabarVan Diemen’s Land7 years1821
Jesse King22WeaverKing StanleySomersetshireVan Diemen’s Land21 years1841
Thomas LongNo occupationKing StanleyHenry TannerLife1834
Nathaniel Lusty34WeaverKing StanleyMariaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1820
Richard Pegler24MilitiaKing StanleyElizabethNew South Wales7 years1820
Thomas smith48WeaverKing StanleyMariaVan Diemen’s Land14 years1820
John Clark17LabourerLeonard StanleyYork New South Wales7 years1830
Susannah Clarke20DressmakerLeonard StanleyGrenadaNew South Wales7 years1826
Charles Pegler20ButcherLeonard StanleyRed RoverVan Diemen’s Landlife1830
Daniel Powell22ShearmanLeonard StanleyAsiaVan Diemen’s Land14 years1827
Charles Redman27WeaverLeonard StanleyJohnNew South WalesLife1827
William Redman47WeaverLeonard StanleyLady HugentNew South WalesLife1834
William Redman20LabourerLeonard StanleyEdenVan Diemen’s Land7 years1836
Charles Wastson21Turner and fillerLeonard StanleyAsiaVan Diemen’s Land14 Years (CTR) or 7 years1827
John Adams22LabourerMinchinhamptonDuncanVan Diemen’s Land22 years1840
Samuel Antill35WeaverMinchinhamptonMariaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1819
James Alder27MasonMinchinhamptonJohn 1 New South WalesLife1831
Thomas Baker20WeaverMinchinhamptonDavid LyonVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
Joseph Blackwell21LabourerMinchinhamptonKatherine stewartVan Diemen’s Land7 years1832
Mary Ann Browning17Clothing BusinessMinchinhamptonAmericaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1831
Nicholas Browning19Clothing BusinessMinchinhamptonSurreyVan Diemen’s Land7 years1821
Maria Bryant 18ServantMinchinhamptonFrances CharlotteVan Diemen’s Land7 years1832
James Bucknall20LabourerMinchinhamptonKatherine stewartVan Diemen’s LandLife1832
Frederick Clark20No occupationMinchinhamptonGilmoreVan Diemen’s LandLife1838
James Davis23LabourerMinchinhamptonJohnNew South Wales7 years1827
George Drew18WeaverMinchinhamptonStrathfieldsayVan Diemen’s Land7 years1831
James Evans 50No occupationMinchinhamptonAtlanticNew South Wales7 years1791
Job Evans20PainterMinchinhamptonMarquis of huntleyNew South WalesLife1835
Robert Evans40CarpenterMinchinhamptonMermaidNew South WalesLife1829
Elias Grange22LabourerMinchinhamptonRecoveryNew South Wales7 years1819
Thomas Grange27LabourerMinchinhamptonAsiaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1827
Thomas Grist 26LabourerMinchinhamptonSouthworthVan Diemen’s Land7 years1839
James Kirby20Cloth worker, Deserted from 89th regMinchinhamptonEdenVan Diemen’s LandLife1836
Samuel Kirby18Cloth workerMinchinhamptonNorfolkNew South Wales14 years1836
John Lock17LabourerMinchinhamptonClaudineNew South Wales14 years1829
John Long 20WeaverMinchinhamptonKatherine Stewart ForbesNew South Wales7 years1832
Thomas Pitt23WatermanMinchinhamptonCompetitionVan Diemen’s Land14 years1823
Richard Reed18LabourerMinchinhamptonRed roverVan Diemen’s Landlife1830
Edwin Smith26LabourerMinchinhamptonSurrey Van Diemen’s Land7 years1832
Joseph Smith20LabourerMinchinhamptonAsiaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1840
William Stephens21LabourerMinchinhamptonBussorah MerchantNew South Wales14 years1829
William Walker41Traveller with hardwareMinchinhamptonRed RoverVan Diemen’s Land14 years1830
Peter Aldridge25ShearerNailsworthAndromeda Van Diemen’s Land7 years1826
James Eddals26No occupationNailsworthMoffattVan Diemen’s Land14 years1837
William Haskins19Cloth-factorymanNailsworthNeptuneVan Diemen’s LandLife1837
George Lane20SawyerNailsworthJohnNew South WalesLife1836
John Newman24LabourerNailsworthPrincess RoyalNew South Wales7 years1822
Thomas Ridler32WeaverNailsworthLarkinsNew South WalesLife1817
James Skirton22LabourerNailsworthAsiaNew South Wales7 years1833
Charles Smart 19Cloth-workerNailsworthHenry WellesleyNew South WalesLife1837
Elias Black 23LabourerNorth NibleySusanVan Diemen’s Land7 years1842
Edward Clarke 17LabourerNorth NibleySurreyVan Diemen’s LandLife1829
James Clarke18BlacksmithNorth NibleyJohn 1 New South WalesLife1827
Thomas Clarke20ShoemakerNorth NibleySir Charles ForbesVan Diemen’s Land14 years1830
William Cole20LabourerNorth NibleyNithsdaleNew South WalesLife1830
Thomas Cornock22WeaverNorth NibleyRoyal CharlotteNew South WalesLife1825
George Gabb25No occupationNorth NibleySurreyVan Diemen’s Land7 years1832
William Gazzard28LabourerNorth NibleyLord LyndochNew South Wales14 years1838
Josiah Hancock22WeaverNorth NibleyJohnNew South WalesLife1827
Sarah Harrison 18ServantNorth NibleyAmericaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1831
Joseph Hobbs26LabourerNorth NibleyLaytonNew South Wales7 years1829
Isaac LeggScribblerNorth NibleyNeptuneNew South Wales7 years1790
Isaac Perrott23ClothierNorth NibleyHadlowNew South Wales7 years1818
Thomas Smith28Labourer, formely in local MilitiaNorth NibleyGuildfordNew South Wales7 years1827
Mary Tavender20ServantNorth NibleyGarland GroveVan Diemen’s Land7 years1841
George Taylor26LabourerNorth NibleyAsiaVan Diemen’s Land14 years1833
William Bushell19LabourerNympsfieldPersianVan Diemen’s LandLife1830
Thomas Daucney27WeaverOwlpenAmericaNew South Wales7 years1829
John Webb22LabourerOwlpenPersianVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
Ann Alder37LabourerPainswickEmma EugeniaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1841
Henry Beard15Cloth-wrokerPainswickFlorentiaNew South WalesLife1827
Samuel Beard23HatterPainswickLady RidleyVan Diemen’s Land7 years1821
John Birt 32ServantPainswickDuncanVan Diemen’s Land14 years (CTR) or life1840
Benjamin Cook30LabourerPainswickGilmoreVan Diemen’s LandLife1838
Carles Cook53WeaverPainswickPersianVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
Isaac Estcourt40WeaverPainswickLord HungerfordNew South Wales7 years1821
James Green27LabourerPainswickBengal merchantVan Diemen’s Land14 years1828
William Haines20LabourerPainswickLady RidleyVan Diemen’s Land7 years1821
Thomas Lane19ServantPainswickHeroineNew South Wales7 years1833
Jacob Twining 20LabourerPainswickLord LyndochVan Diemen’s Land7 years1837
Thomas Twining22BakerPainswickRecoveryVan Diemen’s Land7 years1837
Henry Wager20LabourerPainswickLord LyndochVan Diemen’s LandLife1836
William Cratchley21LabourerRandwickGilmoreVan Diemen’s Land15 years1838
John Watkins 21Edge-tool makerRandwickAndromedaVan Diemen’s LandLife1826
William Biggers26Cloth-dresserRodboroughElphinstoneVan Diemen’s Land7 years1836
John Buck26ShearerRodboroughLord HungerfordVan Diemen’s LandLife1821
James Cole34StonemasonRodboroughAuroraVan Diemen’s LandLife1835
Thomas Dalby 35LabourerRodboroughEmperor AlexanderVan Diemen’s Land7 years1833
Thomas Daniel16LabourerRodboroughShipleyNew South Wales7 years1818
Thomas Evans23BakerRodboroughRed roverVan Diemen’s LandLife1830
Nathaniel Hodges40Cloth-dresserRodboroughElphinstoneVan Diemen’s Land7 years1836
Thomas Latham18Cloth-workerRodboroughIsabellaVan Diemen’s LandLife1833
Benjamin Lewis27Cloth-dresserRodboroughLord LyndochNew South Wales7 years1838
George Matthews24LabourerRodboroughMoffattNew South Wales7 years1836
William Niblett42WeaverRodboroughManglesNew South WalesLife1820
James Walkley50LabourerRodboroughMermaidNew South Wales7 years1820
William Wathen23LabourerRodboroughLord MelvilleVan Diemen’s Land14 years1818
Benjamin Pearce23LabourerRuscombeJohnNew South WalesLife1832
John Anthony18Cloth-rowerStonehouseMinstrelNew South Wales7 years1824
Peter Bowyer21Clock-cleanerStonehouseEdenNew South Wales30 years1840
John Browning35LabourerStonehouseWoodbridgeNew South Wales14 years1839
Edward Evans19LabourerStonehouseKatherine Stewart ForbesVan Diemen’s Land7 years1839
Jane Morgan24LabourerStonehouseHenry WellesleyVan Diemen’s Land7 years1837
Barnaby Alder24Wool-sorterStroudPersianVan Diemen’s LandLife1830
Isaac Alder22MasonStroudPersianVan Diemen’s LandLife1830
John Alder20LabourerStroudPersianVan Diemen’s LandLife1831
George Antill20LabourerStroudLayton 1New South Wales7 years1829
John Apperley23ShoemakerStroudHenry TannerNew South WalesLife1834
John Barnett28Cloth-dresserStroudLloydsNew South Wales7 years1833
George Berry23LabourerStroudEmperor AlexanderVan Diemen’s Land7 years1833
Samuel Bowley27No occupationStroudLord SidmouthNew South Wales7 years1818
James Browning 26WeaverStroudAtlasNew South Wales7 years1819
William Burton 16No occupationStroudLord ShipleyNew South Wales7 years1821
Henry Clayfield22LabourerStroudLord LyndochVan Diemen’s Land15 years1840
Ambrose Clissold27No occupationStroudAtlanticNew South Wales7 years1791
Samuel Clissold27Labourer, former MarineStroudBaringNew South WalesLife1819
William Clissold34WeaverStroudSpekeNew South WalesLife1826
John cook14LabourerStroudRoyal SovereignVan Diemen’s Land7 years 1837
Thomas Cousins46No occupationStroudAtlanticNew South Wales7 years1791
William Cox23Cloth-workerStroudAsiaNew South Wales7 years1833
Richard Daniels21ShearerStroudLord hungerfordVan Diemen’s LandLife1821
Daniel Fletcher21ServantStroudEarl GreyNew South Wales7 years1838
Samuel Gabb21Cloth-rowerStroudDavid LyonVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
John Gardner 17Recovery StroudRecoveryVan Diemen’s Land7 years1837
Abraham Gaston 20WeaverStroudJohn BarryNew South WalesLife1835
John Grimes18LabourerStroudJames PattisonNew South Wales7 years1837
Charles Grist35Cloth-workerStroudDavid LyonVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
James Hall19Cloth-workerStroudMoffattVan Diemen’s LandLife1837
John Hall19No occupationStroudShipleyNew South Wales7 years1818
Peter Hall21ShoemakerStroudMoffattVan Diemen’s Land15 years1837
Thomas Hall18LabourerStroudCountess of HarcourtNew South WalesLife1824
William Harper30No occupationStroudRecoveryVan Diemen’s Land7 years1837
Joseph Holder17ClothworkerStroudCaledoniaVan Diemen’s LandLife1822
Thomas Holder21StockworkerStroudClaudineNew South Wales7 years1829
Charles Howard22StonemasonStroudBengal merchantNew South Wales7 years1836
Edward Hudd33LabourerStroudAugusta JessieVan Diemen’s Land7 years1838
William Jones19LabourerStroudTortoiseVan Diemen’s Land10 years1841
David Keene23WeaverStroudElizabethVan Diemen’s Land7 years1832
Daniel Knee15Cloth-mill workerStroudSpekeNew South WalesLife1826
William lander25Clothing BusinessStroudElphinstoneVan Diemen’s Land7 years1837
William Marmont18WeaverStroudCountess of HarcourtNew South WalesLife1824
James Matthews24BlacksmithStroudWilliam MilesVan Diemen’s LandLife1828
Sarah Mills48 ServantStroudGarland GroveVan Diemen’s Land7 years1841
John Motley36No occupationStroudRecoveryNew South WalesLife1819
Henry Nicholls19Rope-spinnerStroudMoffattVan Diemen’s Land7 years1837
Richard Nicholls25StonemasonStroudJohnNew South WalesLife1832
Thomas Papps16LabourerStroudJames PattisonNew South Wales7 years1837
William Parker23Cloth-workerStroudBengal merchantVan Diemen’s Land7 years1828
William Parker19Cloth-workerStroudBengal merchantVan Diemen’s Land7 years1828
John Parsons22LabourerStroudElphinstoneVan Diemen’s Land7 years1837
Richard Pilliner18Pig-dealerStroudLord LyndochVan Diemen’s LandLife1836
Henry Pitt20LabourerStroudMermaidNew South Wales7 years1829
Thomas Pitt16LabourerStroudThereseaNew South Wales7 years1838
William Poulton25LabourerStroudEmperor AlexanderVan Diemen’s Land7 years1833
Eliza Powell20Cloth-workerStroudNarvarinoVan Diemen’s Land12 years1840
James Roberts 20TailorStroud Katherine Stewart ForbesVan Diemen’s Land7 years1832
William Slade 22ServantStroudJohnNew South WalesLife1827
Henry Smart23ButcherStroudLord LyndochVan Diemen’s Land14 years1831
Amelia Smith37ShoekepperStroudProvidenceVan Diemen’s Land14 years1825
Charles Smith17Scamp and Bone pickerStroudGilmoreVan Diemen’s LandLife1838
Edmund Smith8LabourerStroudHenry TannerNew South WalesLife1834
George Smith20No occupationStroudHenry TannerNew South Wales7 years1834
George Smith32WeaverStroudEdenVan Diemen’s Land7 years 1838
Joseph Smith52Dealer in marine storeStroudChapmanVan Diemen’s Land14 years 1826
Nathaniel Smith24WeaverStroudCoromandelVan Diemen’s Landlife1838
Edmund Tyler18SawyerStroudEmilyVan Diemen’s Land10 years1842
Edwin Walkley15Mason's LabourerStroudJames PattisonNew South Wales7 years 1837
John Ward 17Clothing BusinessStroudSusanNew South Wales7 years1835
James Wathen23BlacksmithStroudKatherine Stewart ForbesVan Diemen’s Land7 years1832
Joseph Wathen20HawkerStroudHenry WellesleyVan Diemen’s Land7 years1837
Thomas White26LabourerStroudEarl GreyNew South Wales15 years1826
Thomas Wilkins49No occupationStroudCountess of HarcourtNew South Wales7 years1828
William Williams32WeaverStroudRed roverVan Diemen’s LandLife1830
George Winn25Clothing BusinessStroudBengal merchantNew South Wales7 years 1836
Thomas Winn19BoatmanStroudGilmoreVan Diemen’s Land30 years1838
William Wood20LabourerStroudVittoriaNew South WalesLife1828
Thomas Worden16LabourerStroudLaytonNew South Wales7 years 1829
James Grimes26LabourerThruppShipleyNew South Wales7 years1818
William Birt 40Spinner, Former Soldier 66th RegUleyShipleyNew South Wales7 years1818
James Croome22MasonUleyPersianVan Diemen’s LandLife1830
Thomas Croome20LabourerUleyIsabellaNew South Wales7 years1831
Isaac Fisher 29WeaverUleyJohnNew South Wales14 years1832
Joseph Fisher29Handle-setterUleyMinstrelNew South Wales14 years1825
William Flint35No occupationUleyMariaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1820
Nathaniel Ford20WeaverUleyPersianVan Diemen’s Land14 years1830
Joseph Hatherall26WeaverUleyAndromedaVan Diemen’s LandLife1826
William Hill27ThatcherUleyMariaVan Diemen’s Land7 years1820
William Hurcombe22LabourerUleyEmilyVan Diemen’s Land7 years & 2 weeks1842
Jacob Jefferies31LabourerUleyAugusta JessieVan Diemen’s Land15 years1838
Nathaniel Poole20CooperUleyLord LyndochVan Diemen’s LandLife1831
Daniel Riddiford31ShearmanUleyBaringVan Diemen’s Land7 years1819
Benjamin Robbins34WeaverUleyElizabethVan Diemen’s Land7 years1831
Nathaniel Beard16Cloth-workerWoodchesterSurrey 1Van Diemen’s LandLife1832
Charles Haines25BrazierWoodchesterPrince RegentVan Diemen’s Land7 years1829
Robert Harrison31No occupationWoodchesterRecoveryNew South WalesLife1819
James Peters BakerNo occupationWoodchesterAtlanticNew South Wales7 ears1791
John Shipton25WatermanWoodchesterHerculesNew South WalesLife1832
George Aldridge19SpinnerWotton-under-EdgeIsabellaNew South Wales7 years1831
Charles Brown23LabourerWotton-under-EdgeMaryNew South WalesLife1832
James Candy27ShearmanWotton-under-EdgeManliusVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
John Candy30SpinnerWotton-under-EdgeManliusVan Diemen’s Land7 years 1830
Joseph Clarke21LabourerWotton-under-EdgeCountess of HarcourtNew South Wales7 years1824
George Collins 18LabourerWotton-under-EdgeLady NugentVan Diemen’s LandLife1836
Charles Cossens 19LabourerWotton-under-EdgeGilmoreVan Diemen’s Land7 years1831
James Cossens19LabourerWotton-under-EdgeStrathfieldsayVan Diemen’s Land7 years1831
Thomas Cossens 23LabourerWotton-under-EdgeEmperor AlexanderVan Diemen’s LandLife1831
Edward Cox23LabourerWotton-under-EdgeIsabellaNew South Wales7 years1831
George Dando19LabourerWotton-under-EdgeChapmanVan Diemen’s Land7 years1833
John Downs17ShoemakerWotton-under-EdgeLloydsVan Diemen’s Land7 years1833
Samuel Fowler19WeaverWotton-under-EdgeNeptuneNew South Wales7 years1820
William Griffin19LabourerWotton-under-EdgeNeptuneNew South Wales7 years1820
Daniel Hall26LabourerWotton-under-EdgeMalabarVan Diemen’s Land7 years1821
Jeremiah Harmer29ThatcherWotton-under-EdgeLord MelvilleVan Diemen’s Land7 years1818
William Hayward26LabourerWotton-under-EdgeLord LyndochVan Diemen’s LandLife1831
Samuel Holder18ClothworkerWotton-under-EdgeGilmoreVan Diemen’s Land7 years1830
William Hunt24BrickmakerWotton-under-EdgeClydeVan Diemen’s Land14 years1830
John King22WeaverWotton-under-EdgeElizabethNew South Wales7 years1820
Joseph Knight 40WeaverWotton-under-EdgeLarkinsVan Diemen’s Land7 years1831
John Lewis19WeaverWotton-under-EdgeGilmoreVan Diemen’s Land7 years1831
Thomas Organ26LabourerWotton-under-EdgeBengal merchantVan Diemen’s Land7 years1828
Robert Pegler23LabourerWotton-under-EdgeLord LyndochVan Diemen’s LandLife1831
Joseph Phillips30AccountantWotton-under-EdgeTortoiseVan Diemen’s Land15 years 1841
Joseph Povey19Clothing BusinessWotton-under-EdgeElizabethVan Diemen’s Land14 years1831
Lewis Rymer20LabourerWotton-under-EdgeJohnNew South Wales7 years1832
Elihu Smith23TailorWotton-under-EdgeSusanNew South Waleslife1835
Henry Summers15Clothing Mill boyWotton-under-EdgeHindostanVan Diemen’s Land10 years1840
Henry Walker25LabourerWotton-under-EdgeLord LyndochNew South Wales7 years 1833
Edwin Webb20WeaverWotton-under-EdgeJames PattisonNew South WalesLife 1836
Michael Witts22LabourerWotton-under-EdgeFlorentiaVan Diemen’s Land14 years 1930
William Woolen20LabourerWotton-under-EdgeCandaharVan Diemen’s Land21 years1842
Henry Workman28StockworkerWotton-under-EdgeJohnNew South WalesLife1827
Charles Young30LabourerWotton-under-EdgeCoromandelVan Diemen’s Land10 years1838
Joseph Young27Labourer, Formely a soldier 32 RegWotton-under-EdgeElizaNew South Wales7 years1819

With thanks to Noah Griffiths for creating this spreadsheet.

Stroudwater and Empire (and Morris Dancing)

Stroudwater and Empire (and Morris Dancing)
(Written after reading The Cloth Industry in the West Country 1640-1880
J. De L. Mann)

Chalford has such a labyrinth of weavers’ walks and footpaths –
And on a mid-winter’s day, with plumes of smoke rising from Chalford Bottom
(‘A remarkable place for the great number of clothing mills and the great quantity of cloth made there and in the neighbourhood’),
Mistletoe in the trees, light folded in envelopes of cloud,
It’s hard to imagine that this picturesque Cotswold village
(This ‘little Commonwealth of Cloathiers and Clothworkers –
not like in the Nation’, said John Aubrey in the 17th century)
Was once hand in glove with the East India Company,
As at Sevill’s Upper Mill,
Now a select residential development,
With the stream, now private and sequestered,
Between houses and a car park.

This landscape was once a fretwork of
‘Scarlet, Crimson, Blue and a variety of other delightful colours’,
Uley, Dursley, too, and Nailsworth and Painswick
(‘The land of clothiers, who in these bourns building fair houses
because of the conveniency of water so useful for their trade’),
A fretwork of profits and prices and exports and wages
And strikes and patterns of trade slumps and booms,
Linking the Thames and Severn Canal and the River Frome –
With the Ganges Valley, Bengal, Delhi, Bombay, Madras, Calcutta, Canton,
And with Robert Clive, Warren Hastings, the Marquess Wellesley,
And with muskets, cannon, Stroud Scarlet, slavery, opium, cotton, coffee and tea:
‘The increase in soldiery in India, either European or under European command, provided a much larger market … India was the only country which remained
a preserve for West of England cloth throughout the 18th century.’
‘Gloucestershire seems to have had
almost the sole custom of the East India Company’,
And ‘Up to 1833 the East India Company was still taking for China
a large proportion of Gloucestershire’s production.’

Contemporary websites are not so different from Aubrey’s 17th century
View of felicitous harmony:
They project a multicultural, almost spiritual, perspective
On Stroud cloth and the East India Company:
‘Granted a fifteen-year Charter in Elizabeth the First’s reign, the Company mostly traded for textiles, spices, and tea, ¾ Red is a colour of great symbolic importance to many cultures. For example, Hindus believed that the spirit of red cloth could transform a person’s soul so that a “red one” might become a sorcerer. Soldiers wore red turbans in battle, women wore red clothes and reddened their hands and hair during marriage and fertility festivals. Indian rulers copied the red coats of the East India Company, clothing their own armies in scarlet broadcloth to make them more impressive.’
Or
‘The British East India Company traded widely in Asia from the late 17th century. The East India Company sustained the Gloucestershire broadcloth industry,
as others declined in the late 18th century in the face
of competitive Yorkshire mills.’
Or
‘The indigenous communities trading with the Hudson’s Bay Company and the East India Company adapted the cloth and integrated it into their own traditions of material culture.’

There is no hint of oppression, imperialism, asymmetrical power, war,
Or the ideology of racism,
But rather more a projection of fair exchange and mutuality,
No hint of the fact that ‘trading and political power were closely interlinked’,
Nor that the East India Company was also involved in the slave trade
In Madagascar, St Helena, Bengkulu and Angola,
Exchanging guns, gunpowder, cutlasses, cloth, and piece goods,
No hint that Bristol merchants bought textiles from the Company
To exchange for slaves in West Africa,
No hint of the fact that the East India Company, in effect,
Governed on behalf of the British government,
For over a century,
Exploiting and contributing to the decline of the Mughal Empire,
No hint of the fact that the Company sold Indian grown opium,
To be smuggled to China, to flout the Imperial ban,
The profits paying for tea for domestic consumption;

Instead a comforting emphasis on:
“Trade in spices, pepper, cloth, cloves, nutmeg,
Cinnamon, silks, tea, cotton, coffee, and so on”,
Instead a typical information plaque in Nailsworth:
‘Gigg is so small and tucked away that it is hard to imagine that it was once the generator of great wealth. In the 1790s John Remmington bought it and other mills. From the profits he added a sumptuous wing to his house up the hill at Barton End. His cloth was bought by the East India Company for sale to China.
An entry in the Company books briefly records the final settlement
after his retirement:
December 1811 Broadcloth J Rimmington £180

But our conclusion acknowledges a different final settlement:
These cottages clambering up the Cotswold hillsides, this Golden Valley harmony of water, wood and stone is derived, in some degree, from war, slavery, racism,
opium and imperialism.

We have written before of Raphael Samuel’s point that Heritage and Tradition can too easily morph into ‘an expressive totality … projecting a unified set of meanings which are impervious to challenge … a fixed narrative which allows neither subtext nor counter-readings’; but, ‘History is an allegorical as well as … a mimetic art … like allegorists, historians are adept at discovering a hidden or half-hidden order. We find occult meanings in apparently simple truths.’

Which leads ineluctably from the impact of the East India Company on our parochial landscape, to Morris dancing.
Just as a landscape can mask an asymmetry of power, imperialism and racism in a celebration of red cloth heritage, so can blackface Morris deceive.

Stroud has its unique anti-slavery arch, of which we are justly proud.
We perhaps feel more ambivalent about the Blackboy Clock in Nelson Street:
‘A clock called the Blackboy Clock, with an explanatory plaque,
That foregrounds horology rather than slavery –
Indeed, there is absolutely no reference whatsoever to the Age of Enlightenment,
And the engendering of an ideology of justificatory racism,
Nor to the symbolism of the black boy being the relentless slave of Time …’
We might also be surprised at our parish register references to ‘ye blacks’
in Stroud-water in the 17th and 18th centuries:

Bisley, 1603, John Davies, ‘ye black’ was buried

Nympsfield, 1719, Daniel, ‘a black stranger’ was buried

In 1773, Francis London, ‘a servant to the Rt. Hon. Lord Ducie supposed to be 17 years of age – a native of Africa’ was baptised;
In 1778, in Rodborough, ‘William Jubiter – black’, was buried;
In Stroud in 1786, Adam Parker, Negro, 32, was buried with a parish funeral;
In Frocester in 1790, William Frocester, ‘supposed to be 11 or 12 years old, born on the island of Barbados, and now a servant of Edward Bigland Esq. residing in Jamaica, was baptised’;
Stroud, 1801, ‘William Ellis, son of Qualquay Assedew, a Negro of Guinea, aged 12 years, was baptised’;
1815, Bisley Testimonial from Richard Raikes, for John Hart, Writing Master, to the post of master at Bisley Blue Coat School:
‘Unfortunately he is a Mulatto, a native of the West Indies’;
Minchinhampton, 1826, Thomas Davis, ‘an infirm travelling Black’ was buried, 67 years old.

We might also feel surprised at the Stroudwater residents who received compensation for the liberation of their slaves in 1834:

Rev. Joseph Ostrehan, Sheepscombe Parsonage: 3 slaves in Barbados and £85 8s 11d compensation; Samuel Baker (Lypiatt Park): 410 slaves in Jamaica and £7,990;   John Altham Graham Clarke (Frocester Estate):  482 slaves in Jamaica and £8, 934 8s 8d;   Mary Elizabeth Clarke (nee Parkinson) (Frocester): 214 slaves in Jamaica and £3,879 4s 0d; Mary Wilhelmina Lindsey (nee Jarvis) (Minchinhampton): 276 slaves in Antigua and £4,194 12s 7d; William Chacon Lindsey – as above – ‘Springfield’, Forward, Minchinhampton; Walter Maynard (Uley): 154 slaves in Nevis and £2, 720 9s 9d.

The Age of Augustan Elegance, the Age of Reason, the Enlightenment,
And the Grand Tour all have a partial provenance
In the profits of slavery and racism,
They are writ in water in our landscape as well as writ in stone,
But self-evident truths, ideologies and traditions change
With the passage of time and with changes in values:
Sometimes on the part of the elite, and sometimes
On the part of the ‘swinish multitude’.
And as some Morris dancers have said – just like Eric Hobsbawm –
That traditions can be invented and re-invented:
Like ‘blackface’.
It’s true that blacking up has some history of subversion:
Poachers tearing down enclosure fences,
Or citizens at toll house turnpikes;
And I know that some folk see the Morris blacking up
As having pagan connotations;
It isn’t about racial oppression, they say.

But it does have a racial connotation for many of us,
It makes us feel uncomfortable to be in its Morris presence,
It’s not ‘political correctness gone mad’,
It’s a feeling of embarrassment and unease –
Coupled with the fact that, as with the presentation
Of the East India Company,
It can delude, deceive and distort:
The Truth that dare not speak its name…

A morris dancer goes into a bar and the bar keeper says, “Why the black face?”

I have been a fan of Border Morris for many years. I am old enough to have seen it in the early years of its revival, the 1970s.  This exuberant and dynamic form of dance had a major impact on me and I was soon smitten. I fully accepted the “orthodox” explanation that the use of full blackface make-up had no racist connotations and that it was traditionally used merely as a disguise to protect the dancers’ identity so that they would not get into trouble for begging. Indeed, I have repeated this explanation to others over the years, most notably in my many (and mostly unsuccessful) attempts to persuade non-folky friends that Morris Dancing was “cool” and they really should watch it.  This was the answer I would have given to the barman in the title of this piece – until recently.

 I feel that I can no longer give the “disguise” explanation.

There is some unavoidable evidence that the use of blackface in Border Morris might be linked to many sides adopting the trappings of 19th century minstrel shows.  It seems that the use of blackface may actually have been intended to be a caricature of a black face.

In addition to this there does not seem to be evidence of a blackface tradition in Border Morris that predates the pre-minstrel era.  As Stuart points out, blacking the face has been used for disguise, criminality and subversion at certain points in the past but it is questionable that this was the case in Border Morris.

In some folk circles there has been considerable resistance to accepting that blackface could well have racist roots. I can understand this.  At first I was reluctant to consider it.  I dearly wanted their to be a clear subversive tradition of blackface as disguise in Border Morris as a authentic link to the past.  However, it is just not supported by the evidence.

There has been a great proliferation in Border Morris in the last 10 years or so.  Many sides have adopted face painting styles to make it clear that there can be no racist connotations.  Colours other than black or non-full face patterns are used.  However many sides persist in using full blackface, presumably on the grounds that it is “traditional”.  The problem with this is that very little about the current manifestation of Border Morris could be said to be traditional. Certainly not the very elaborate (and beautiful) costumes and almost certainly not men and women dancing together!  Why do some sides feel it is ok to adapt tradition for so many aspects of their art, but stubbornly stick to using full blackface in a
way that might be linked to a racist caricature of black slaves?

The next time a sceptical friend or a hypothetical bar keeper asks the question about blackface what do I say?  The best I can manage is a it MIGHT be a tradition of disguise but it MIGHT ALSO be the perpetuation of a racist caricature of black slaves….

To all sides still using full blackface – please change.  Please.

Mark Hewlett.

Black and British (and Stroud)

Black and British a Forgotten History Cover

Black and British A Forgotten History David Olusoga

Bunce Island in Sierra Leone was once an early British slaving headquarters: ‘In exchange for slaves and other valuable commodities the British offered glass beads, bundles of cloth, gunpowder, European metal goods, tobacco pipes, bottles of liquor and European weapons. Until a few years ago the ground was … littered with tiny glass beads and fragments of pottery … Most of these grim souvenirs have been hoovered up by tourists … but many more relics of the trade lie beneath the soil, along with iron nails used to attach shackles and chains to African arms …’

Stroud’s Triangular Trade

‘Bundles of cloth’:
Stroud Scarlet
Shuttles and looms:

Shuttles and looms:
Stroud Scarlet
Shackles and chains:

Shackles and chains:
Stroud Scarlet
Bundles of cloth:

Bundles of cloth,
Shuttles and looms,
Shackles and chains:

Stroud’s Triangular Trade

Trade Cloth

Trade Cloth: strouds, scissors and shrouds

We travelled track 32 from Grand Central,
The Hudson Line up to Beacon,
Where fires were once lit on the Fishkill Mountains,
To warn of British army redcoat movement;
The hills and woodland were all red fall tint,
On both sides of the catspaw, white horse Hudson,
Where the Wappinger tribe once roamed free,
Until a Dutch royal patent transferred their land
To fur traders, merchants and millers;
And as our train moved upstream,
Through clouds of leaves whipped down by the wind,
I dream-glimpsed two traders in their beaver hats,
Paddling up the Hudson,
Scarlet cloth and scissors packed in their canoe.

I waved a greeting from home,
From Claire Honeyfield in the Made in Stroud shop:
‘I visited a private collection of First Nation clothing and effects in the redwoods of Northern California. Every tribe had “trade cloth” included somewhere in their traditional dress … All the way from little Stroud.’

They waved back in return,
As they headed into the wilderness,
From my dream-time manuscript
I had left in lower east side Manhattan:

‘I sailed from Bristol with a witch’s hag-cough,
Spitting phlegm on the ropes and rigging
All through the Atlantic’s winter storms;
The River Hudson brought no relief,
Just fog and headaches, as we made our way upstream.

Our trade went well with all the tribes,
Stroud Scarlet cloth, their prize;
With knives, rum and scissors and guns;
Beaver pelts, land and bearskins, ours.

Stroud Scarlet gave scant shelter
From our colds, catarrh and shivering agues;
Their death-rattle was our invitation
To praise God’s Will – with fences, palisades,
And the cultivation of funeral virgin wastes,
As we advanced inland with Protestant virtue.

Our mirrors too were well received,
Until the squaws regarded their small poxed reflections,
And rushed into the forests to die by their own hands.

‘Tis God’s Will.’

I turned back from my reflection in the carriage window,
And picked up my copy of White Savage
(Recommended to me by Chris Moore,
When I bumped into him at Wallbridge) –
Fintan O’Toole’s book is about
‘William Johnson and the Invention of America’:

‘The biggest sellers were the coarse woollen blankets called strouds, which the Iroquois found to be lighter than fur or skin, easier to dry and therefore more suitable for a mobile life in a terrain of forest and river. They also came in bright colours which natural berry and root dyes could not match … The high quality and relatively low price … were so much appreciated by the Iroquois and other Indian nations that they represented perhaps the single biggest advantage the English enjoyed over the French colony in Canada in the competition for fur and allies.
When William Johnson began to trade in earnest from 1740 onwards, he provided woollens in shades of blue, red and black … suggesting that the Indians had very definite preferences … Crimson … red … ribbons in deep red, deep blue … deep yellow; scarlet, blue and green stockings for women; and coats of blue cloth with red cuffs.’

Stroud Scarlet, Uley Blue, Berkeley Yellow …
Stretched out on tenterhooks in the five valleys …