Ye 17th Century Prologue
The Reformation and Desacralisation of the Landscape
‘This book, Inhabiting the Landscape, Place, Custom and Memory (Chapter 2, Religious Topographies) by Nicola Whyte is the only source that I have come across that deals with this in any depth, and while it’s expensive unless you’re lucky, it seems that Google will let you read the relevant chapter. World of Books produced a really cheap copy, but only after having it on a list for many months. Nicola Whyte is now at Exeter University, and it’s worth looking her profile up, as her area of interest is so “right on”.
But perhaps I should summarise…
Following the accession of Edward VI in 1547, Protestant reformers turned their attention to the superstitious beliefs and practices of ordinary people by attacking and destroying the visual imagery and ritualistic culture of parish communities across the country, which continued under Elizabeth and later the Puritans. There’s an argument that Catholic rites became transposed into folk rituals that were tolerated and, as such, eased the transition from a Catholic to a Protestant society. The changes were not just to churches and the way they were used, but also to a very wide range of holy sites. Between 1530 and 1550 the infrastructure of the late medieval landscape was drastically altered, especially by the suppression of monastic institutions and the closure of pilgrimage centres. In a religious society, many areas of practical, mundane existence were infused with sacred connotations, so, as people worked in the fields, their lived environment was a context for beliefs, far beyond the confines of church and churchyard. In the late medieval period individuals and communities were engaged in ostentatious displays of their religiosity, which led to parishes with more than one church, sometimes adjacent, and outlying chapels too. The nature of faith meant the accumulation of wealth was not prominent, and charitable works as well as legacies that might lessen the time spent in purgatory was a significant thing to do. Popular belief in the intercessionary role of the saints helped to sustain a dense network of sacred sites and produced a landscape defined by ritual movement, linking pilgrimage and monastic sites with a host of minor sites, such as holy wells, parish, monastic and private manorial chapels, hermitages and local churches. Chantry chapels were built on or adjacent to churchyards or were found within the church, where a priest would pray to reduce a person’s time in purgatory, if they had been suitably endowed. The less wealthy might do this by belonging to a guild or fraternity. There were a number of poor monastic houses, nunneries, chapels, hospitals (for pilgrims) hermitages and cells in the landscape. Bridges were a distinctive feature of Christian theology, representing the role of Christ, bishops and popes as intermediaries of God. As a result there were many chapels and hermitages on bridges. Donations were both to the priest, for prayer, but also served the important function of upkeep for the bridge: the benefit to the community being a benefit to one’s own spiritual life (as in time spent in purgatory): “All contributions to the comfort of one’s neighbours were understood as a dimension of the promotion of charity, the divine life of the community.” Pilgrimage routes were inscribed with monuments and buildings, chapels and crosses, which deepened the experience of the journey itself, and villages on thee routes sought to promote their own shrines and holy wells. Stone and wooden crosses were the most ubiquitous elements in this medieval religious landscape, but largely overlooked by modern historians, in church yards, and vast numbers besides roads. Mnemonic devices to remind the living of their duty to pray for the souls of the dead, and relieve them of the traumas of purgatory, too. Then those often placed at road junctions, which had magical or malevolent qualities, and used in Rogation tide beating of the bounds. The proliferation of crosses, chapels ,holy wells, hermitages and other holy places and landmarks ensured religious imagery was encountered in a wide range of everyday contexts, well away from the parochial core of the church: a landscape rich in religious meaning and symbolism shaped peoples’ lives. Later…Puritans dismissed the concept of a holy place as idolatrous. Victorian church restorations sometimes uncovered items that had been hidden at these times, presumably in the hope that the old religion would prevail again. Following Henry’s death in 1547, the government ordered the destruction of all shrines, paintings and sculptures purporting to have superstitious use, and all endowments of chantries, religious guilds to be relinquished on the grounds that Purgatory was a fabrication. As a result many buildings fell into disuse and decay. (And, of course, churches now had to display royal arms.) Churchyard crosses were targeted because of their role in the (now banned) churchyard processions. Many prominent road side ones were partly destroyed, but still had a function in defining parish bounds, the parish becoming more important as an administrative unit in Tudor England.
That’s it in summary, Bill’
Addendum
‘And that shift represented a change from religious observance being an external business ( symbols, saints, confession, secret language of Latin) to it being an internal one: me, my conscience, a direct relationship with God, interpreting through reading an English Bible.’